The officer authorized to order punishment shall consider whether the employee has been given sufficient opportunity to present an explanation or justification, and evaluate the explanation submitted by the employee and all the available evidence and make a clear decision. In this way, the officer who has the right to order the punishment should make a decision regarding the punishment order according to schedule-13.
(2) Regardless of what is written elsewhere in this paragraph, it shall not be decided to impose a punishment that is more than that after proposing a punishment to the employee and asking for clarification and explanation. But if there is a situation where more punishment is required due to any reason, the procedure of rule 100 and 101 will have to be completed again and the decision will have to be made.
(3) According to sub-rule (1), when deciding to give departmental punishment to any employee other than clause (b) of section 81 of the Act, the decision should not be made in such a way that it will be implemented before the date of the decision. However, it shall be applicable from the day after the completion of sixty days in case of punishment for the offense under clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 84 of the Act and from the date of conviction by the court in case of punishment for the offense under clause (a) and (b) of sub-section (2) of the same section. A decision can be made.
(4) In relation to any employee, the authority authorized to order punishment against the shadow of the departmental punishment order issued in accordance with sub-rule (1) shall be given to the concerned employee without penalty.